Frustration wrote:
This is not my fault I’m unable to play this or any other current file format.
Actually, yes, it is. The specifications are published on the box for a reason. You’re expecting the box to do something it wasn’t designed to do, and you’re saying it’s the box’s fault. No, it’s not the box’s fault that it can’t play things it wasn’t designed to play. It’s your responsibility for not doing proper research and study before buying technology you don’t understand.
And I assume your behavior and manners are a result of buyers remorse and the onset of the realization that you didn’t do your homework, and now it’s cost you.
Frustration wrote:
OK… then this begs the question why is this spec not supported?. This is not my fault I’m unable to play this or any other current file format.
You have a LOT to learn about hardware-based media players – I guess this is the first one you’ve ever used?
Unlike PCs which have HUGE processors and vast amounts of memory, set-top-box media players have tiny CPUs and very little memory. The software only controls the user interface, network functions, navigation and other basic functions.
All of the media decoding is hardware based. The CPU itself has video decoders built into the silicon. It’s not software doing the decode. As such, support for additional codecs via firmware updates happens next-to-never.
I would be interested in finding out if you ever find a media player that does support “all the current specs.” I’d be interested if you even find one that supports High@L5.1
You spent less than $70 for this box. If you want a player that supports more advanced specifications, why did you buy the cheapest box out there? You will need to spend somewhere on the order of $300-$400 to get a player that supports the more advanced stuff you’re demanding.
But please, do yourself a favor and make sure you read (_ and understand _) the specifications before you buy another player.
Frustration wrote: It appears 5.1 is a more recent spec then why doesn’t WD support it and how much longer before it does?
No, that’s not correct. 5.1 is a different PROFILE. It’s not a “more recent spec.”
Frustration wrote: Am I suppose to dumb down my files to work in your outdated player?
Oh, my gosh. You really have no idea what you’re talking about, do you?
Dumb down? Given the specifications in the mediainfo you posted, you (as the encoder of the video) should never have used L5.1, as the video has NONE of attributes that would have required L5.1 in the first place.
Your video is only 1280x544 resolution. That’s not even Full HD. The bit rate is only 1.5 Mbit/second. Given that, your video should have been encoded at L3.1, not L5.1. It’s only using 1 Reference Frame for crying out loud! :laughing:
High@L5.1 is intended for videos with resolutions up to 4Kx2K, with bitrates up to 240 MEGAbits per second, and 5 reference frames at max resolution!
So, I would submit that the way you’re encoding your videos, it’s already “dumbed down” about as far as it goes. And changing the profile to match won’t do anything except make the decoder more efficient.