Tony, It’s only feedback and honest, not slating anyone. Maybe indicating a bit of frustration but no slating of anyone.
Put this one in the roadmap. Not everyone will have a massive hard drive like on the MBL but have a few smaller drives, maybe over several computers or several hard drives within one computer.
Extend the Safepoint facility so one safepoint can back-up a group of shares to one destination, another safe-point can back-up another group of shares to another computer or same computer but another hard drive? Some safe-points don’t need to be scheduled others maybe?
As an example to the above paragraph… I have (as you know) a 500Gb NAS. I can keep that on and have a scheduled safepoint back-up happen to that as the shares I’ll be backing up like this will be more dynamic in nature. Files coming, going and changing frequently. Another safepoint would be manually started as it’s group of shares would back-up to, say, a computer my media collection which will me more static in nature. Not that many changes to it and unline the second NAS I would not wish to keep a power hungry computer running for the sake of receiving back-ups. The other NAS takes just as much power as as the MBL.
I can’t justify just going out and buying another 1Tb NAS for the sole purpose of using it as a back-up device. Financially a lot of people have more important so spend their money on like fuel for the car to take them to work and back as well as keeping a roof over their heads so I.T. is not a priority but they would like to use what they already got to safeguard their information. As stupid as the latter may read, I believe it’s true.
Second question… If it possible to access all the files from the Safepoint back-up as refyular files while the MBL is sent off for repair or are all the files held in an archive. I’ve not got to use the safepoint back-up yet because I simply don’t have the required “lump of free storage” to place a back-up of the MBL I’ve got.
Seriously… Have a look at at how Microsoft’s SyncToy works and put the equivalent of that on the MBL. As the synchronising will be performed/managed on the MBL it would not matter if the target is a PC or a MAC and all the files can be easily accessed on the target (of the safepoint bacup). Should any files get changed on the target then the MBL would be able to pick-up those changes and replicate them back to itself. Now that would be a totally awesome feature!
So, unfortunately, the safe-point back-up at the moment does not work right for me so I can’t yet use it. I could use if if I could omit several shares from the safepoint. Yes, I’m aware that if I needed to restore ALL the data then I would need to manually copy the stuff not safepointed back to the MBL. Would not be as automated, a minior inconvenience but can be tollorated.
Remember… Give the owner of the MBL a choice of what to do with their data. Either safepoint back-up the whole lot or a sub-set. (Put it another way… I already have a copy of my media collection on the second NAS. Why do I need to back-up the whole lot again? The media collection at the moment takes up two thirds of the MBL’s used storage and is mostly static data.)
That’s my two-cents worth.
WDTony wrote:
Myron - thans for the feedback. Always enlightening reading your messages
Safepoints - This is version 1.0. Think we have a roadmap planned???