chgohotdog wrote:
What a stupid comment. WD ABSOLUTELY has to do this. Just like all other hardware and software manufacturers, it is their responsibiltiy to insure that their products remain compatible with OS updates, and in a timely fashion. Or maybe you like the idea of replacing your hard drives, printers, scanners, etc., every time an OS gets revised?
Now that is a stupid comment. Software and hardware has always been tied to a specific range of OSes. Actually, even tied to specific chips.
Software (and OS’es) that were written for '386s wouldn’t run on '286s if they used '386-specific instructions… if you tried running them on an older chip anyways, it’d just crash with the '386-specific new opcodes that were jibberish to '286s.
Likewise '486 code wouldn’t run on '386 machines… and so on…
And there were a lot of devices that simply couldn’t be upgraded to Win2k from Win98, due to the changes Microsoft made. None of Dell’s Inspiron notebooks that had hardware decoding for the DVD drive could be upgraded to Win2k… due to the changes, a new driver was physically impossible due to the arcitecture. Even now, 13 years later, there still isn’t such a thing as a driver for those Inspirons for any OS after Win98. How’s that for a “timely fashion”? And it wasn’t just the Dell’s… there was lots that became usuable under Win2k.
The choice was to either upgrade your hardware, or not upgrade the OS.
It happened with Vista all over again – e.g. lots of ATI graphics cards wouldn’t (and still won’t) run under Vista… you either didn’t change OS, or you went out and got a different card.
This isn’t the first time that a change has been incompatable with previous or future things, and it won’t be the last.
Commodore found out the hard way that if you try to maintain 100% backward compatability, then you lose forward motion and get left in the dust.
Progress involves moving forwards… that’s why hardware and software specifically list what OSes and what processors it will run on (and by exclusion which ones it won’t). Win7 simply won’t run on an old 8088, no matter how “stupid” you think it is that it can’t.
WD’s external drives simply don’t have drivers for Server 2008, Server 2003, 2000 Server, 2000, ME, 98SE, 98, 95, 3.1, 3.0 – there’s no onus on WD to maintain compatability with past or future systems. They do it when they can, because they want to, but if future compatability is impossible, they are not required to do it.
Same with Apple… it’s always better to maintain compatability, but they’re not obliged to… or you end in the same sunk boat as Commodore… they’re allowed to change things, and even break compatability. No one put a gun to anyone’s head and forced them to install Lion.