Question about Seek Error Rate

Hello,
I have two 500 GB Caviar Black drives and one of them is displaying some peculiar (to me anyway) SMART numbers. Basically, on the drive on which I have my OS (multi-boot, various flavors of Windows) the SEEK ERROR RATE infrequently flips between 200/200/0/0 and 100/253/0/0 (current/worse/threshold/data) and back again. This happens in no predictable fashion (ie, not just between boot ups). The second drive’s SER stays at a constant 200/200/0/0.

I have recently had some infrequent system hangs at Windows startup but a reboot starts up just fine.

The drive models are both WD5002AALX and are a bit over 5 years old.

The other SMART data seems fine but for completeness sake, I’m listing the SMART data reported by HD Sentinel below (sorry for the poor formatting)…

Is this behavior normal or should I be pro-active and replace the drives? Any suggestions would be appreciated.

 Attribute                     Thresh  Value   Worse         Status                              Data

Raw Read Error Rate 51 200 200 OK 000000000000
Spin Up Time 21 139 138 OK 000000000FB0
Start/Stop Count 0 98 98 OK (Always passing) 000000000993
Reallocated Sectors Ct 140 200 200 OK 000000000000
Seek Error Rate 0 100 253 OK (Always passing) 000000000000
Power On Time Count 0 62 62 OK (Always passing) 000000006E1A
Spin Retry Count 0 100 100 OK (Always passing) 000000000000
Drive Calib Retry Count 0 100 100 OK (Always passing) 000000000000
Drive Power Cycle Count 0 98 98 OK (Always passing) 00000000097D
Power off Retract Cycle Ct 0 200 200 OK (Always passing) 000000000068
Load/Unload Cycle Count 0 200 200 OK (Always passing) 00000000092A
Disk Temperature 0 113 99 OK (Always passing) 00000000001E
Reallocation Event Count 0 200 200 OK (Always passing) 000000000000
Current Pending Sector Count 0 200 200 OK (Always passing) 000000000000
Off-Line Uncorrectable Sector Ct 0 200 200 OK (Always passing) 000000000000
Ultra ATA CRC Error Count 0 200 200 OK (Always passing) 000000000000
Write Error Rate 0 200 200 OK (Always passing) 000000000000

The unit seems healthy with regards to current values, but is indeed degraded. A pro-active replacement would be a good decision, but I can also see this hard drive still working 6 months to a year from now unless there’s a sudden failure.

Trancer,
Thank you for your response. I’m inclined to perform a proactive and long overdue replacement of this drive with an SSD.